We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
PROFILE OF THE TV AUDIENCE continued
WHAT & WHEN VIEWERS WATCH Networks programs by type
Daytime (Sun.-Sat.)
Afternoon (weekday)
Children's Western 30-min.
Miscellaneous Children's 30-min.
Daytime Serial 15-min.
Daytime Serial 30-min.
Quiz & Audience Particip. 30-min.
Misc. Adult 30-min. Misc. Adult 60-min. or more
Nighttime (Sun.-Sat.)
Adventure General Drama General Drama Situation Comedy Suspense Drama Suspense Drama Western Western General Variety General Variety Quiz & Audience Particip. Misc. Evening Programs Misc. Evening Programs
Morning (weekday)
News f Adventure half Children hour -j General Drama shows I Situation Comedy L Miscellaneous
No. Viewers (000's)
11,301 11,664 5,791 6,739 6,408 6,467 3,901
% of all People 7.3 7.5 3.7 4.3 4.1 4.2 2.5
% of Viewers Viewers per Home
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
2.4 2.2 1.6 1.8 1.6 2.0 1.7
No. Viewers
% of all
% of
Viewers
(000's)
People
Viewers per Home
News
6,347
4.1
100.0
1.5
'Adventure
3,118
2.0
100.0
1.6
Children
12,154
7.8
100.0
1.8
half
General Drama
3,558
2.3
100.0
1.6
hour
Situation Comedy
5,576
3.6
100.0
1.6
shows
Western
3,257
2.1
100.0
1.6
Miscellaneous
2,909
1.9
100.0
1.7
Feature Films
3,991
2.6
100.0
1.5
Weekend (daytime)
30-min.
19,226
12.4
100.0
2.6
30-min.
22,599
14.5
100.0
2.4
60-min.
18,273
11.8
10O.0
2.3
30-min.
23,748
15.3
100.0
2.5
30-min.
20,156
13.0
100.0
2.4
60-min.
25,005
16.1
100.0
2.5
30-min.
32,231
20.7
100.0
2.6
60-min.
31,618
20.3
100.0
2.8
30-min.
14,905
9.6
100.0
2.5
60-min.
25,462
16.4
100.0
2.6
30-min.
23,009
14.8
100.0
2.4
30-min.
14,652
9.4
100.0
2.4
60-min.
22,953
14.8
100.0
2.7
programs by
type
News
5,115
3.3
100.0
1.8
' Adventure Children
7,956
5.1
100.0
2.1
6,284
4.0
100.0
1.6
half
General Drama
10,712
6.9
100.0
1.8
hour
Situation Comedy
7,043
4.5
100.0
2.0
shows
Western
6,145
4.0
100.0
1.8
, Miscellaneous
2,600
1.7
100.0
1.6
Feature Films
8,469
5.5
100.0
1.9
4,682 3/303 4,587 3,662 4,088 4,345
3.0 2.1 3.0 2.4 2.6 2.8
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
1.5 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.4
Early Evening (Sun.-Sat.)
News 12,284
"Adventure 15,150
Children 11,445
half General Drama 10,123
hour ~i Situation Comedy 9,864
shows Western 16,508
„ Miscellaneous 7,194
Feature Films 6,597
Late night (Sun.-Sat.)
half hour shows
7.9 9.7 7.4 6.5 6.3 10.6 4.6 4.2
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
1.9 2.3 1.9 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.0
News
13,012
8.4
10O.0
1.8
'Adventure
16,144
10.4
100.0
2.0
General Drama
11,825
7.6
100.0
1.9
J Situation Comedy
12,841
8.3
100.0
1.9
Western
16,276
10.5
100.0
1.9
I Miscellaneous
13,300
8.6
100.0
1.7
Feature Films
10,023
6.5
100.0
1.8
YARDSTICKS TO FORECAST SALES
Adman's dream may come from outgrown measurements, ARF told
$X advertising on Y advertising vehicle = $Z sales.
It's not that simple yet, but experts think it's going to be. Some of them told the Advertising Research Foundation's annual conference how they're trying to reduce rating, cost-per-thousand and other data to an absolute sales yardstick.
Richard F. Casey, vice president of Benton & Bowles, opening the session, called it "the most pressing, most urgent problem facing us today. . . ." The conference on "Better Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness, the Challenge of the 1960's" drew more than 800 to the Waldorf-Astoria in New York Sept. 25.
Among those who addressed themselves to the question were Seymour Banks, vice president in charge of media planning and research for Leo Burnett Co.; Paul E. J. Gerhold, vice president and national director of media and research of Foote, Cone & Belding; Arno Johnson, J. Walter Thompson vice president; Benjamin Lipstein, associate research director of Benton & Bowles, and a battery of specialists from businesses and universities.
Mr. Casey listed some of the gauges
36 (BROADCAST ADVERTISING)
presently available, "usable measurements which tell us that advertisement "A" is more memorable than advertisement "B"; that television commercial "X" tells its story more clearly than does commercial "Y". . . . These are useful measurements of a given aspect of advertising effectiveness and help materially in many decision situations," he said, but "what does seem to be new is the brightening glow on the horizon that may indicate that at long last it could be possible to develop and apply measurements to the most basic meaning of the term 'advertising effectiveness'— the contribution of advertising expenditures to corporate profit."
Media Stalemate • Leo Burnett's Dr. Banks called for new media measures to cover existing gaps and also because "we seem to be at an impasse when it comes to making sound inter-media comparisons."
He credited "the spectacular rise" of broadcasting with adding research problems. Old methods are of dubious worth for new media, he said. "For example, the technique of measuring radio audiences is also used for television, but people question whether exposure to a radio program is equivalent to exposure to a
television program [and] ... as the use of spot announcements becomes a more and more significant element of advertising expenditures, we find techniques which have been developed to evaluate broadcast programs are being asked to evaluate the announcements placed between programs."
The price of television has made measurement of results more urgent, Dr. Banks said. "In this medium, an advertiser is very often asked to make commitments involving a million dollars or more for a program which has never appeared on the air before. The amount of money involved in these commitments, the rigidity that contracts for both talent and facilities introduce into an advertising plan, and the uncertainty as to the success of a program, have combined to raise real questions on the value of this kind of advertising. However, this involves studying not only an individual program or the medium as a whole, but alternative advertising vehicles as well.
"The point I wish to make is not a criticism of television, but merely a statement that the problems involved in evaluating the television medium have probably intensified many advertisers'
BROADCASTING, October 5, 1959