Building theatre patronage : management and merchandising (1927)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CHAPTER XX CO-OPERATIVE ADVERTISING THE motion picture theatre, by allying itself on a co-operative advertising basis with merchants, schools, societies, clubs and newspapers, can get a more complete circulation of its advertising message at less cost than would be otherwise possible. Co-operative advertising has been used more extensively by the motion picture industry than by any other. Theatre managers are mainly responsible for the continuance and the development of this beneficial practice because co-operative advertising requires individual handling and adaptation to local conditions. Considering the benefits which the theatre can offer to the co-operating parties, the fullest possibilities of co-operative advertising have not as yet been secured. This can be traced either to neglect, or to a failure to realize the possibilities that exist. In some cases co-operative advertising is not secured because the matter is not presented convincingly. Mutual Advantages. Co-operative advertising to be completely successful should offer mutual advantages for each of the co-operating parties. It is not good business for the manager to arrange a campaign of co-operative advertising which will benefit only the theatre. By misrepresentation and exaggeration, the other co-operating party might be persuaded to contribute effort and money. But after the co-operative advertising campaign has been executed, if the benefits were negligible, it is not likely that another plan would be accepted. Thus one possibility is permanently lost to the theatre. Besides, there is developed ill-feeling and a natural grievance. Those who have failed to benefit by co-operating with the theatre, criticize its methods. The circulation of this criticism influences 236