Close Up (Jul-Nov 1927)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

^LOSE UP public showing of progressive and developmental films. But remember there are mam^ cows on the track and it may take time. * * Hi A great number of my corresp^ndants (to whom herewith I tender thanks) have got away with the idea that I am, that Close Up is, out to high-hat and scorn the commercial film, and go on to elevate the whole cinema industry to a point ,of indescribable aestheticism. Far from it. We w^ant it understood that we accept and laud the film in any form ; the worst filmi has its public and its foUovv ing. And for that reason, for a time at any rate, if not forever, there will be a market for the worst films. Just as little penny novels go the rounds, and keep scullery maids amused, so the worst film is in demand. But the thing is that there is a great lack oi distinction ; broadly speaking anything up to seventyfive per cent of miodern films are at a certain level ; they have moments, thej^ reach a vast majority, they satisf}^ But there is a minority of several million people to whom these films are tiresome, a minority that loves the film, but has too much perception, too much intelligence to swallow the often dismal and paltry stories and acting set up week by week before it on the screen. This minority has got to have . films it can enjoy, ^Ims with psychology, soundness, intelligence. Nobody wants (as a matter of fact a great many do) to rob the masses 15