Close Up (Jul-Nov 1927)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP The producers and actors seem lifted from the ordinary rut, and almost forced to do their best ; perhaps because the fantastic scenario is so suited to the tremendous scope of the screen. Yet to-day we find Robinson directing " The Last Waltz", and Murneau in America. At any time such a state of affairs would be lamentable, but it is all the more so now. When we find ourselves in conversation with someone out of screen grace we tell them of "Destiny", "Warning Shadows", "Dr. Caligari","The Xibelungs". "Where can I see these films ?" asks the unbehever. Then we are compelled to explain that these fihns are no longer in general release, and the sceptic smiles discreetly. The last state of that man is ten times w^orse than the first. How we could do with another "Golem" to-day, when the eyes of the world are wandering in the direction of the screen ! Such a film, if the renter would give it a fair chance, would be acclaimed to-day where yesterday it would have passed unnoticed. To-day the public are fed to the teeth with the mechanical Hollywood fare that they themselves have helped to create. Such a film also w^ould convert those who have been tempted, by recent newspaper controversy and legislation, to look at the screen, but are looking at it dubiously, and are, in fact, preparing to turn their backs on it. Incidentally some of the screen's ardent apostles could do with a little encouragement in this shamefully arid period. Even if this new masterpiece storms the renter success 63