Close Up (Jul-Dec 1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CLOSE UP London brighter, and deserves a hand : in spite of Backwaters, an Asta Xeilsen movie into which the censor insisted on inserting Freudian compHcations. My private theory is that the vogue of Von Sternberg is not unconnected with the resemblance of his name to that of the master. Highbrows lost their heads about The Case of Lena Smith; another example of Sternberg's method of telling a film by titles. Silhouette of Pudovkin ; the talkies I I heard the famous bacon sizzling in Old Arizona, and saw Pauline Frederick holding bits of tulle to her throat to hide whipcord veins while she ennunciated in On Trial. It is too early vet to know whether Pudovkin has utilized the true imagerv of sound, that remains for next year's survey. To quote an interview which I had with Pabst, and which appeared in The Kinematograph Weekly : — " Yesterday we were all travelling in a Blue Train, to-day we are back in the caravan fighting the Indians. Of course, the critics grumble ; the talking picture has thrown us back ten years, but that is exactly what we directors love." " ^Ir. Pabst is vital enough to take pleasure in fighting the Indians ; although he holds that for the next decade scientific inventions will force the pace. The public will be content to go again and again to the kinema to hear each time an innovation that makes the new picture more perfect than the last. Still, when the public does crave once more for art, the brains will be there, because there is money in the talkies/' Having quickly run through all that I look back and back and seek for further sub-divisions ; it strikes me that I might review the year's satires, epics, as well as the spectacles, 28