Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

119 label must bear the following statement: "THIS FILM IS NOT THE VERSION ORIGINALLY RELEASED. IT HAS BEEN PANNED AND SCANNED. THE DIRECTOR AND CINEMATOGRAPHER OBJECT BECAUSE THE ALTERATION REMOVES VISUAL INFORMATION AND CHANGES THE COMPOSITION OF THE IMAGES." This label would be affixed to the video box, not once, but in two locations, and then placed on the shelf in a video store to advertise the availability of the movie. The voluntary labeling program that covers 90% of the films distributed, makes this kind government mandated requirement totally unnecessary. A consumer is informed, but without having the product denigrated. Under the dictates of H.R. 1248, a consumer is likely to perceive that they are being told the altered version is an inferior product, one they would not enjoy nearly as much as the original version that had been approved by the director and screenwriter. These denigrating labels would be confusing to customers and deter them from renting or purchasing the cassette. II. H.R. 1248 COULD IMPEDE THE DISTRIBUTION OF FILMS H.R. 1248 would create the possibility of restraints on the sale of films after adaptation for television or home video. Just as a product is ready to send to a network or video retailer, squabbling over whether labeling was adequate could delay the availability of the product until it was stale or prevent distribution to the retailer and, more importantly,