Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

440 Preserving the Theatrical Experience fx)r Older Films ttnc key hi promoliiij; icportory exhibition is incrcasini; ilic availabilily of good-guality 35min prints of older U.S. films. Currently these prints are screened in a handful of commercial theaters, nonprofit niuseiuiis and archives, and tllm festivals. The commercial repeilory market is small compared to first run exhibition, but such screenings are important in continuing public education aKnit .Vmerican culture and film an. Repert0i7 piDgrammers. in informal interviews this spring, believed that availability of titles in good-quality .^.Smm prints has declined over the past five years, although no national statistics have been kept lliey identified as unavailable many relatively recent independently produced narrative features as well as older "classic" titles, with the availability of the latter varying significantly among the major studios. The range of .^."^mm prints available to an exhibitor currently depends on per.sonal contacts, the theater's reputation, and its nonprofit or commercial status. A few difficulties nterely involve communication and logistics. Tracking down exhibition prints of older .American films is probably the most timeconsuming challenge of rei^rtory work and c;ui require contacting any number of studios, exhibitors, archives, or collectors. ITie following four recommendations suggest various options to expand access to .American films as they were originally experienced. Recommendation 4.1: Repertory Exhibitors I'rgc rvhibitors of older American films to work as a group to incrciise 35mm print availability Representatives of several major studios have expressed genera! w illingness to strike new 35mm exhibition prints if preprint is a\ailable and if assured of a sufficient number of exhibition engagements. However, it is currently difficult to get collective feedback from exhibitors of older .American films. Many such exhibitors -the commercial theaters, nonprofit museums and archives, and film festivals-exchange information informally, but they lack a means of [xxiling preferences for print suppliers. As a first step, the N.itional Film Preservation Board plans to convene a working session of studio, distributor, archive, and exhibitor representatives to review the current interrelationships of market demand, preservation work, and exhibition print prixiuction for older .American fiction films and look for ways to integrate exhibitor input. Ideally, after meeting informally. s(vciali/ed repertory exhibitors would choose to form an organization of their own to work with print suppliers. 12 Rfdffvtiftf Film Prrserwuion