Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

462 out" in film life, as well as computerized analysis of environmental data that "sums up" a long period of temperature and humidity readings into a single life-expectancy value. There is also a need for improved techniques for monitoring the condition of films over time so that archives can duplicate films or take other preservation measures when necessary. Conclusion Film must be managed like any other valuable, but finite, national resource. We can no longer afford to have a narrow focus in film preservation, concentrating on just one approach or one type of film. A new preservation policy must emphasize education, prevention of decay, and closer integration with outreach activities that make film accessible to a wider audience. This requires an educational initiative to teach the theory and practice of preventive care, and new tools with which to monitor and assess storage conditions. It will involve reexamination of both the funding structures and the practices of film preservation, but it will result in more films being available to us and to future generations. Drafted by James Reilly (Image Permanence Institute), in collaboration with the other members of the Redefining Preservation Task Force: Allen Daviau (American Society of Cinematographers), Peter Gardiner (Warner Bros.), Stephen Gong (Pacific Film Archive), Robert Heiber (Chace Productions), and William Murphy (National Archives and Records Administration). 38 Redefining Film Preservation