Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 (1996)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

471 universities, festivals, arcliives, etc.). All loans would be subject to prior written approval by the studio. F. The studio would underwrite the cost of all laboratory work and contribute to the cost of the archive's services. Financial arrangements would vary from program to program and depend on the particular features of the project and internal factors unique to each studio and archive. Typically, the studio would cover the costs for laboratory services on those titles approved for upgrade or restoration, and contribute to the archive's direct costs for inspection, evaluation and restoration services. The studio would control the annual cost of the program by the number of titles selected and the types of elements prepared. These costs would be estimated in the budgets prepared by the archive for each title prior to studio approval of restoration work. G. The studio and archive representatives would meet on a regular basis to monitor the work and share preservation information. This might involve one-on-one meetings between the studio and archive, or, should the studio prefer, larger sessions in which the studio meets with several public archive partners to share information on joint projects and preservation issues. Drafted by the Public-Private Cooperation Task Force: Mary Lea Bandy (Museum of Modern Art), Raffaele Donato (Film Foundation), Douglas Gomery (University of Maryland), William Humphrey (Sony Pictures Entertainment), Scott Martin (Paramount Pictures), Brian O'Doherty (National Endowment for the Arts), Edward Richmond (UCLA Film and Television Archive). Supporting Document C: Studio-Archive Restoration Projects 47