The educational screen (c1922-c1956])

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Better Times Ahead William R. Duffey Head of Visual Instruction Division, University of Texas. IT is with considerable satisfaction that we, who are constantly dealing with schools and communities,* note a decided reaction on the part o: school authorities and community leaders against the poorer class of non theatrical films. Not so long ago, those in charge of schools and communitiei were prone to accept any sort of motion pictures that did not offend witt vulgar situations or suggestive titles. This state of things has changed, or at least is changing rapidly. Today these same leaders are demanding that the non-theatrical film shall be the equal to the theatrical film in every way, but without the offensive elements some- times found in theatrical productions. They are not content with certain film* formerly effectively dubbed "non-theatrical," yet which most often were z cut-and-patch-product begot from films that in their first days of existence were wearily ground out by hand in the loft of the dime theatre. Indeed, il is most gratifying that individuals have learned to say about these films "Requiescant in pace." Seemingly, many community leaders are learning tc have nothing to do with such material, however it may be padded here and cul there, and prefer to leave the old theatrical films in some silent graveyard where they belong. What is more surprising, such leaders are doing this ir spite of the efforts of certain individuals, who must have derived their pub- licity graces from kissing the Blarney stone, and are still endeavoring to sell or rent these old releases by dubbing them "non-theatrical films, suitable foi community recreation." Despite this wholesome wariness as to what is offered to them for com- munity recreation, many school and community leaders could still go to theii library and read the life of Barnum with considerable benefit. There still remain many educators who buy or rent motion pictures under the influence oi the title of the release. They are under the sway of names and if the name be that of a classic, so much easier is the tendency to be taken in. There is nothing in the name of an English classic, for example, to prove that it is in good physical condition and that it has not scenes and dramatic situations at constant variance with the principles of art or with the literary subject matter, Nothing can quite take the pleasure out of a motion picture performance as can mis-frames and broken films. Again, if the picture be a colorless some- thing, giving nothing but the empty husk of the classic whose name it bears, it cannot fail to offend an intelligent viewer. 10 \