The history of three-color photography (1925)

Record Details:

Title:
The history of three-color photography
Date:
1925
Publisher:
Boston : American Photographic Publishing Company
Volume:
The history of three-color photography
Leaf #:
000549
Language:
English
Subjects:
Motion Pictures, Motion pictures--Technology
Collection:
Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
September 21, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Screen-Plate Practice 533 used the former method and found that the pictures gradually acquired a rosy tint, due probably to solution of the red dye by the glycerol, which would in time penetrate the varnish film ; further the plates developed patches, that looked like bacillary growths. A. D. Brixey114 patented a projection screen, composed of a translucent light-diffusing screen for receiving the projected rays and a nonreflecting-reducing screen for transmitting the picture to the eyes of the audience. Practically it seems to have been a modification of the Autochrome plate, and the results were said to be shown in colors, although the projected picture seems to have been in black and white only. 1. Phot. Coul. 1909, 4, 94; Brit. J. Phot. 1909, 56, Col. Phot. Supp. 3, 52; Brit. J. Almanac, 1910, 602; Jahrbuch, 1910, 24, 170; Compt. rend. 1909, 148, 36; Chem. Ztg. 1910, 91. C. Adrien, Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1912, 58, 400; abst. C. A. 1912, 6, 837, used a 1 : 1,000,000 pinachrom bath. 2. Phot. Coul. 1911, 6, 81; Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1911. 58, 379, 383; Phot. Korr. 1911, 58, 483; Wien. Mitt. 1911, 19; Brit. J. Phot. 1911, 58, 47; Brit. J. Almanac, 1912, 660; Bull. Phot. 1912, 10, 829. 3. Phot. Coul. 1910, 5, 141; Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1910, 57, 275; 1911, 58, 382, 403; Photo-Gaz. 1910, 20, 214; Brit. J. Phot. 1910. 57, 65; 1912, 58, Col. Phot. Supp. 6, 17; Brit. J. Almanac, 1911, 618; 1913, 693; Jahrbuch, 1911. 25, 200; Phot. Mitt. 1910, 47, 292; Wien. Mitt. 1910, 443, 585; 1911, 11; abst. C. A. 1912. 6, 837. Cf. F. Monpillard, Phot. Coul. 1912. 7, 77; Brit. J. Phot. 1913, 60, Col. Phot. Supp. 7, 33; Brit. J. Almanac, 1914, 700. E. Vallot, Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1913, 60, 360. L. Gimpel, Der Phot. 1913, 19, 381. A. Personnaz, Phot. Coul. 1918. 3, 163. E. Coustet, Rev. Sci. 1911, 49, 239. V. Cremier, Photo-Gaz. 1912, 22, 171. T. K. Grant, Brit. T. Phot. 1912, 59, Col. Phot. Supp. 6, 36. 4. Wien. Mitt. 1911, 5; Phot. Korr. 1911, 48, 483; Brit. J. Phot. 1911. 58, 29; Brit. J. Almanac, 1912, 659; Jahrbuch, 1911, 25, 199; abst. C A. 1911, 5, 3767. 5. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1911, 58, 400; Phot. Ind. 1912, 939; Jahrbuch, 1913, 27, 296; Brit. J. Phot. 1911, 59, Col. Phot. Supp. 6, 12. 6. Wien. Mitt. 1913, 2. 33; Phot. Chron. 1913, 20, 214; Phot. Ind. 1915, 689; abst. C. A. 1913, 7, 1447; Phot. J. Amer. 1913, 50, 437. 7. Photography, 1914, 49; Brit. J. Almanac, 1915, 522; Jahrbuch, 1915, 29, 140. For descriptions of drying boxes see : H. G. Drake-Brockman, Brit. J. Phot. 1913, 59, Col. Phot. Supp. 7, 9; Brit. J. Almanac, 1914, 701. F. Monpillard, Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1914, 61, 184; Brit. J. Phot. 1914, 61, Col. Phot. Supp. 8, 36. 8. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1908, 55, 349; 1912. 59, 126; Brit. J. Phot. 1908, 55, Col. Phot. Supp. 2, 75; 1913, 60, ibid. 7, 1, 13; Brit. J. Almanac, 1909, 649. G. Denjean, F.P. 570,098 patented the use of varnish or waterproof cloth round the edges of screen-plates while hypersensitizing ; abst. Sci. Ind. Phot. 1924, 4, 185. 9. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1921 ; Brit. J. Phot. 1921, 68, Col. Phot. Supp. 14, 4. 10. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1914, 61, 360, 3S9 ; abst. C. A. 1914, 8, 1243; Phot. Korr. 1920, 57, 275; Phot. Mitt. 1911, 48, 369. 11. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1922, 64, 90, 130; Rev. Frang. Phot. 1922. 3, 90; Brit. J. Phot. 1922, 69, 349; Col. Phot. Supp. 16, 25, 27; Amer. Phot. 1922, 16, 725; Brit. J. Almanac, 1923, 409. It is interesting to note that W. H. Hyslop (see p. 250) used an ammoniacal solution of silver chloride with erythrosin in 1887. 12. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1924, 65, 345; abst. Rev. Frang. Phot. 1923, 4, 302; 1924, 5, 47; Sci. Ind. Phot. 1924, 4, i, 12; Amer. Phot. 1924, 18, 570. This process is not applicable to ordinarv plates. 13. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1924, 61, 11, 48, 165; Brit. J. Phot. 1924, 71, Col. Phot. Supp. 18, 9, 15, 25. 32, 42, 48; Rev. Irang. Phot. 1924, 5, 72, 96, 117, 189, 292; Phot. Ind. 1924, 553; Amer. Phot. 1924, 18, 570; abst. Brit. I. Almanac. 1925, 314; Phot. Chron. 1924, 31, 430; Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1924, 66, 208; PhotoRev. 1925, 37, 64; Camera (Luzerne) 1925, 3, 184; abst. C. A. 1925, 19, 1230. 14. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1924, 66, 83, 92; Amer. Phot. 1924, 18, 693; 1925.