The history of three-color photography (1925)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

562 History of Three-Color Photography available chlorine was obtained in the solution. The paper, after this treatment, was to be exposed whilst still damp under the colored original or Autochrome. The bleaching action took place readily and the print was fixed by destroying the sensitizer by a reducing agent, such as sodium sulfite, bisulfite or ammonia, or as alternative to the latter, the paper might be fumed with ammonia. 1. Brit. J. Phot. 1907, 54, Col. Phot. Supp. 1, 49; Phot. Coul. 1907. 2, 149. Cf. Mees and Pledge, Brit. J. Phot. 1907, 54, Col. Phot. Supp. 1, 75. 2. Brit. J. Phot. 1907, 54, Col. Phot. Supp. 1, 81; Phot. Coul. 1907, 2, 181. L. Gimpel, Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1908; Brit. J. Phot. 55, Col. Phot. Supp. 2, 61 confirmed Piper's conclusions. R. Child Bayley, Photography, 1907, 369; Brit. J. Phot. 1907, 54, 831 ; Bull. Soc. franc. Phot. 1909, 56, 325 stated that he had obtained duplicates that were as good as the originals. Cf. Anon. Brit. J. Phot. 1907, 54, 858. 3. Zeits. Repro. 1908; Brit. J. Phot. 1908, 55, Col. Phot. Supp. 2, 30, 69. Cf. Von Hubl, ibid. 82, 93; Wien. Mitt. 1912, 609. W. Scheffer, Phot. Rund. 1908, 11, 52. The form of the silver deposit depends on the angle at which one set of lines crosses the others. The areas are rectangular only when the crossing lines are at right angles. Phot. Chron. 1908, 15, 193; Zeits. Repro. 1908; Brit. J. Phot. 1908, 55, Col. Phot. Supp. 2, 76; Das Atel. 1908, 15, 18, 97, 107, 122; Jahrbuch, 1909, 23, 315. 4. Rev. Trimestrielle, 1910, 13, 24; Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1909, 51, 457; Penrose's Annual, 1909, 15, 149; Brit. J. Phot. 1910, 57, Col. Phot. Supp. 4, 1; Phot. Mitt. 1910, 47, 22; Photographic 1910, 17. Cf. A. Villain, Photo-Rev. 1910; Brit. J. Phot. 1910, 57, Col. Phot. Supp. 4, 27. L. Gimpel, Photo-Rev. 1908, 20, 80. C. Konig, Brit. J. Phot. 1910, 57, Col. Phot. Supp. 4, 67. E. Konig, Phot. Korr. 1910, 47, 115. G. Winter, Brit. J. Phot. 1910, 57, Col. Phot. Supp. 4, 75. 5. Wien. Mitt. 1910; Brit. J. Phot. 1910, 57, Col. Phot. Supp. 4, 59. Cf. Wien. Mitt. 1912, 609; Phot. Rund. 1913, 50, 81. 6. Brit. J. Phot. 1908, 55, Col. Phot. Supp. 2, 34; Phot. Coul. 1908, 3, 137, Das Atel. 1911, 18, 96, 107, 122; abst. C. A. 1912, 6, 459; Chem. Ztg. Rep. 1911, 132; Jahrbuch, 1912, 26, 371. Cf. L. Didier (p. 423), as to the use of pinachromy for printing from screen-plates. 7. Phot. Korr. 1910, 47, 584; Jahrbuch, 1911, 25, 633. E. Cousin, Brit. J. Phot. 1913, 60, 330; 1914, 61, Col. Phot. Supp. 8, 7; Phot. Mitt. 1913, 50, 373 detailed experiments with arc lights. 8. Phot. Coul. 1908; Brit. J. Phot. 1908, 55, Col. Phot. Supp. 2, 35; 1910, 4, 8. Cf. H. Bouree, Photo-Rev. 1909, 21, 130. E. Grills, Brit. J. Phot. 1907, 54, 764. On making enlarged negatives from Autochromes see Brit. J. Phot. 1913, 60, Col. Phot. Supp. 7, 44. 9. Brit. J. Phot. 1909, 56, Col. Phot. Supp. 3, 33 ; Phot. Coul. 1909, 4, 29. Cf. J. V. Alteneder, Amer. Phot. Annual, 1911, 25, 128; Brit. J. Phot. 1911, 58, Col. Phot. Supp. 5, 7. L. Gimpel, ibid. 5, 53; Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1912, 26, 121. 10. Brit. J. Phot. 1914, 61, Col. Phot. Supp. 8, 3, 10; ibid. 1918, 65, ibid. 12, 15; Camera Craft, 1914, 21, 407; abst. C. A. 1914, 8, 1923. Cf. F. Dillaye, Les Nouveautes Phot. 1910, 122. A. Le Mee, Brit. J. Phot. 1911, 58, Col. Phot. Supp. 5, 30. 11. Phot. J. 1919, 59, 88; Brit. J. Phot. 1919, 66, Col. Phot. Supp. 12, 15, 18; Annual Repts. 1919, 4, 512; Camera Craft, 1919, 26, 201; Amat. Phot. 1919, 47, 200, 359. Cf. E. Coustet, Brit. J. Phot. 1911, 58, Col. Phot. Supp. 5, 28. J. R. Fuller, Brit. J. Phot. 1924, 71, Col. Phot. Supp. 18, 2. 12. Penrose's Annual, 1916, 21, 87; Brit. J. Phot. 1915, 62, Col. Phot. Supp. 9, 2; 1916, 63, ibid. 10, 4, 7. Cf. W. A. Heydecker, Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1914, 56, 172. 13. Phot. Coul. 1908; Brit. J. Phot. 1908, 55, 97. 14. Bull. Soc. frang. Phot. 1908, 50, 317; 1923, 65, 23; Amer. Phot. 1923, 17, 495; Brit. J. Phot. 1908, 55, Col. Phot. Supp. 2, 61; 1910, 4, 75; Photo-Gaz. 1908, 18, 222. 15. Brit. J. Phot. 1909, 56, Col. Phot. Supp. 3, 71. Cf. Penrose's Annual, 1910, 15, 161; 1911, 16, 12; Brit. J. Phot. 1911, 58, Col. Phot. Supp. 5, 3. 16. Phot. Coul. 1909, 4, 153; Brit. J. Phot. 1909, 56, Col. Phot. Supp. 3, 78.