Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

March, 1930] SURFACE TREATMENT OF SOUND 285 to a high gloss, and then coating a solution of paraffin on the edges for lubrication. Sample No. 95 which was simply buffed and then edge-waxed with a paraffin solution is the next in order of choice. This sample was cleaned and retreated after every ten runs. As a third choice, No. 101, which was merely bathed on the cleaning machine in a solution of carbon tetrachloride containing 0.25 per 1C 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 SO 90 100 IK) HO 130 FIG. 3. Curves showing change in relative ground noise volume level with continued projection. cent of cantol wax when new and cleaned in the same solution after every ten projector runs, offers a moderate degree of protection without requiring the use of a polishing machine in the first treatment or in the after treatments. A slight degree of protection was effected by the treatments indicated in Table VI. It is noteworthy that with the edge lubrication treatment (Nos. 96 and 97) there was a definitely lower rate of ground noise accumulation than with an untreated film (No. 103). No protection whatever could be noticed in the case of sample