Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

MULTIPLE EXPOSURE CINEMATOGRAPHY IN SOUND PICTURES WILLIAM STULL* It is hardly more than a year since sound pictures took their place as the major part of studio production programs. In that year an enormous amount of progress has been made, alike in the artistic utilization of the new form, and in the technic of its operation. Studio personnel has grown increasingly familiar with the sound device, and this familiarity has resulted in the overcoming of many of the obstacles which the coming of sound was thought to have placed in the path of true screen technic. An instance of this is the reappearance of such truly cinematographic effects as lap-dissolves and multiple exposure work. A year ago they were regretfully dropped from the cinematic vocabulary due to the added complication of sound photography. Now they are reappearing, as cinematographers and recorders gain more assured mastery of the new medium. Probably the first to reappear were the fade-out and fade-in. Screen technic demanded them. As a rule, they have been made chemically; but to cinematographers, chemical fades are rarely satisfactory substitutes for those made directly in the camera. Similarly, recording engineers greatly prefer to control the fades on their sound tracks themselves. Therefore, in practically all studios, fades are now made directly in the camera and recorder. When recording with the variable density process, by means of a glow-lamp, the most satisfactory method has been found to be the gradual removal of the lamp to a distance from the film at which its light is no longer strong enough to affect the emulsion. While this could of course be done mechanically, it is at present done manually, very little practice being required to attain proficiency. When using the light-valve method, two courses are possible. One may either gradually stop down the lens of the recorder, or reduce the amplification from the mixing-panel. Both of these methods are also appliable to the variable area processes, while of course the only control possible for the disk systems is through the amplifier * American Society of Cinematographers, Los Angeles, Calif. 318