Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

486 J. I. CRABTREE AND H. D. RUSSELL [J. S. M. p. E. acid appears to be the most suitable available acid for non-hardening baths because it does not materially affect the hardening properties of a potassium alum fixing bath and has a minimum tendency to precipitate sulfur therein. Of the common acid salts which can be used for this purpose, sodium bisulfite is perhaps the most suitable since it does not impair the properties of the fixing bath and, so far as is known, will not blister the film under normal conditions. Of the available hardening agents for use in acid hardening stop baths, chrome alum was considered the most promising because it is capable of producing a greater degree of hardening than potassium alum and is therefore suitable for use at high temperatures, under which conditions the use of a hardening stop bath is usually desirable. Both acetic and sulfuric acids were tested to determine their suitability for use in acid hardening baths. Hardening Action of Chrome Alum Solutions. — In the preliminary experiments, the hardening action of chrome alum solutions on both neutral and alkaline film was investigated. The most alkaline film met with in actual practice was that placed directly from the developer into the stop bath without rinsing. The neutral film was rinsed for fifteen minutes after development and before placing in the chrome alum bath, which rendered it less alkaline than any met with in actual practice. In making the hardening tests, strips of motion picture positive film were developed for five minutes in D-16* at 70°F., rinsed for fifteen minutes (neutral film) and then agitated in the chrome alum bath every thirty seconds for three minutes. For the alkaline film tests the rinse was omitted. On leaving the bath, the film was again rinsed for fifteen minutes, fixed in a plain 30 per cent hypo solution for five minutes, washed for twenty minutes, and the hardening determined as in the case of fixing baths.1 The acidity of the solution was determined in the following manner: * Formula D-16 Metric Avoirdupois Elon 0.3 gram 2 ounces Sodium sulfite (desiccated) 40 . 0 grams 16x/2 pounds Hydroquinone 6 . 0 grams 2*/2 pounds Sodium carbonate (desiccated) 19.0 grams 73/4 pounds Potassium bromide 0 . 9 gram 58/4 ounces Citric acid 0.7 gram 4Y2 ounces Potassium metabisulfite 1 . 5 grams 10 ounces Water to make 1 liter 50 gallons Average time of development: 5 to 10 minutes at 65 °F. (18 °C.).