Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (1950-1954)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

ig. 10. Brush penmotor charts of film before (below) and after (above) micropolishing. Sharp spike at right is a reference mark common to both curves. Figure 9 is a reproduction of photolicrographs of areas of film which show 'here the little hills have been leveled. )riginally these had the globular apearance of the nodules shown in Fig. 5. "he polished area is always irregular, nd always very shiny as indicated by he glare areas. It will be noted there > no trace of shadow, showing good .atness. Figure 10 shows some Brush •enmotor charts of a length of film before nd after Micropolishing. These charts vere made b'y recording a steady 1000ycles/sec tone, and then playing back nto the penmotor. Whenever there is a nomentary reduction in playback level t is indicated by the penmotor which esponds very rapidly and shows changes n level of very short duration. This ype of variation will not be shown by lormal volume indicators. To make the est a severe one, the bias current was djusted to give peak output. The ower part of Fig. 1 0 shows the dropouts resent before Micropolishing* and in the ipper part is shown the same film after Micropolishing. Although the process This is the micropolishing process used by Beeves Soundcraft Corp. in making products bearing their trade-marks "Micro>olished Film" and "Micropolished Tape." was developed primarily to combat nodules, it reduces the effect of other irregularities also. This system has been in daily use for about six months and has resulted in a greatly improved product. Other benefits besides reduction of dropouts have resulted from the better head contact made possible. High-frequency response was improved by about 2 db at 10,000 cycles and there has been a marked reduction in intermodulation distortion. Early in the work on combating dropouts a different approach to the problem was attempted. It was felt that for a time a softer coating should be less troublesome than a hard one, and that if a soft coating did have nodules they would be soft nodules. If the nodules were soft, they might wear off easily, hence there would be fewer dropouts. The first results were quite encouraging and an experimental program was laid out to determine how soft a coating could safely be. Before the program got very far, it was found that the softer coatings which had showed promise were no longer better than our regular material, and some actually were not even as good. It was then discovered that although they were kept in an airconditioned area these special coatings Ernest W. Franck: Dropouts in Magnetic Film 513