The law of motion pictures (1918)

Record Details:

Title:
The law of motion pictures
Date:
1918
Publisher:
New York : Baker, Voorhis and Company
Volume:
The law of motion pictures : including the law of the theatre
Leaf #:
00056
Language:
English
Collection:
Books and Early Cinema
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
September 21, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

xlviii TABLE OF CASES Page Rogers v. Rogers 313 Rogers v. International Silver Co 468 Rolfs v. Pooley Furn. Co.. . . 156 Romeike v. Romeike 481 Root v. Railway 582, 609 Roquemore, Ex parte 397 Rosbach v. Sackett & Wilhelms Co 163 Rose Ball v. The Tribune .... 283 Rose v. McLean Publishing Co 412,440 Roseneau v. Empire Circuit . 257 Roserie v. Kiralfy 139 Rosenwasser v. Amusement Enterprises 247 Ross v. Raphael 521 Roumfort Co. v. Delaney. . . . 369 Rosenberg v. Arrowsmith . . . 397 Rothenberg v. Packard 144 Routledge v. Low. .661, 662, 665 Roy Watch Co. v. Carman Roy Watch Co 459 Royal Albert Hall v. London Council 344, 347 Royal Aquarium Soc. v. Parkinson 360 Royal Baking Powder v. Raymond 450, 453 Royle v. Dillingham 56, 59 Roys v. Johnson 193 RudgeWhit worth, Ltd., v. Houck Mfg. Co 110 Ruggles v. Eddy 582 Rupp & Wittgenfeld v. Elliot 587 Page Rushbrook v. Grimsby Pal ace Theatre 183 Russell v. Briant 588 Russell v. Notcutt 204 Russell v. Smith 339, 340 Russia Cement v. LePage. . . 466 Russo v. Orpheum Theatre 327,331 Saake v. Lederer. . .531, 583, 593, 59S Saltus v. Bedford 592 Salvation Arm)' v. Salvation Army 455 Sampson & Murdock v. Seaver-Radford Co. . . 1 1 1 , 609, 620 Sanborn v. Dakin 610 Sands v. X. Y. Life Ins. Co. . 528 Sargent v. McLeod 48, 50 Sarony v. Ehrich 637 Sarpy v. Holland. . .348, 587. 649 Savage v. Hoffman. . .20, 496, 536 Savage v. Kerker 420 Savage v. Neely 85 Saverv v. Ingersoll 150, 151 Sawyer v. Kellogg 452, 468 Saxe v. Shubert 114, 20S Saxlehner v. Eisner . 449, 450, 456, 468 Saxlehner v. Siegel-Cooper Co 421, 456 Sayre v. Moore 561 Scarano v. Lemlein 164 Schimkevitz v. Bingham .... 400 Schleuter v. Billingheimer . . . 255