Evidence study no. 25 of the motion picture industry (1933)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Foreign Problems <^ <^> <^> <^ <^ ^> 407 American interests desired the abandonment of all contingent and quota regulations, particularly when the purpose of such regulations was to subsidize motion picture producers. American representatives pointed out that their organizations had expended large sums in building up a business in France. It was estimated that the gross receipts from the distribution of American pictures in France approximated from 1% to 2% of the total foreign revenue of the larger American companies. In addition to the loss of sales it was estimated that, if new regulations made it unprofitable to maintain distribution in France, a loss in theater and real estate investments of approximately $5,000,000 would be suffered by three of the largest companies. The French motion picture industry was not in complete accord as to the wisdom of more stringent import restrictions. Within the Chambre Syndicale de la Cinematographic Franchise (French Motion Picture Chamber of Commerce), there were separate organizations of exhibitors, distributors, and producers, whose interests were of such a conflicting nature that a divergence of effort was apparent during the consideration of the film decree by the government. French exhibitors, particularly in the provinces, expressed sympathy with the American position in the controversy. American pictures were relatively popular; it was reported that 63% of the total number of play dates in French theaters were for American pictures.10 At an exhibitors' convention, many argued that a quota plan might be of assistance to the small number of French producers but that it was of no benefit to the rank and file of theater operators. A protest in the form of a petition signed by 2,500 exhibitors was prepared which declared that the exclusion of American pictures would cause the theaters and the government to suffer heavy financial loss, and deplored the patriotic issue 10 The European Motion Picture Industry in 1928 by Trade Commissioner George R. Canty. Published by the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce.