National Archives and Records Service film-vault fire at Suitland, Md. : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, June 19 and 21, 1979 (1979)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

:om 159 escape from a hazardous occupancy, 8. Under no circumstances should contractors' rren be pernitted to work in the vault until all nitrate film had been removed. Cord wiring, exposed 200 v/att globes, electrical drill v/ork is c< pletely unjustified v/hcn nitrate filn is present, 9. The failure of the v;aterflo\j alarm is indicative of poor inspection and maintenance practices, 10. './hile the Standard is silent on humidity controls, there is sufficient information avai1a!:le to recognize that it is an important factor in nitrate film preservation. Sorre hifmidity controls should have been provided, 11, The failure to provide a ncans of transmitting an alarm is evidence of noncompliance v/i th standard safety practices but is not overly significant, 12. If ttie construction of the vaults v/as Standard or Code conforming, the doors self or automatic closing and latching, and vents propci'ly installed, the fire should not have spread beyond the vault in v;hich the fire originated, 13, Fire suppression activity leaves so.iething to be desired. First v;as the failure of firemen to v;ear self-contained breathing apparatus. Then to open a number of vaults and leave doors open when no fire was found encouraged fire spread. Breaking out of vents v/hich v.'ere improperly constructed may vrell have contributed to the spread of the fire, ]k. The recomnendai-ions of tlie ad hoc committee are in order, in my opinion, except for the [Drohibition of cardboard boxes and the punching of a hole in the tin cans, 15. Film sliould be hand inspected and any showing bubbles or further decomposition s'lould be destroyed or very carefully printed on safety film