Optical projection: a treatise on the use of the lantern in exhibition and scientific demonstration (1906)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE PARTS OF A LANTERN 31 slide itself, and these scattered rays also diverge more with the greater distance. This is the chief reason why more light is required in working a long way from the screen; though light is also perceptibly absorbed by the atmosphere, especially if it is at all a damp night. Hence it is an important question, how far this loss of light from long focus must be provided for. Some makers recommend several sets of double-combination objectives of very large diameter, at a cost of 9Z. to 10£. apiece! After investigating the matter carefully, both in theory and practice, I have not the slightest hesitation in saying that such costly lenses are a sheer waste of money, of absolutely no benefit to anyone but the seller of the apparatus. Assuming the back conjugate focus of the condenser to be 4 inches (i.e. about 8 inches from the back of the condenser) and the radiant to be |-inch in diameter, nearly all the effective rays can be condensed into an objective of 2-inches diameter, up to 9 inches from the face of the front lens of the condenser. This gives a focus for a double combination of, say, 10 inches, within which there is no need of greater diameter, and no benefit from it. Beyond that a 2-inch lens will begin to lose light, but 2J-inches diameter will carry the same result up to 13 inches; and it is only when we reach distances of 15 inches and upwards that 3-inch lenses are of any real advantage. For such long foci, however, the ' double combination ' is quite unnecessary, as with care in selection, single achromatics can be obtained, which will give quite as good images with far less weight and expense; and perfection should rather be sought in improving this class of lenses, especially in the triplet form described a page or two back; which will also pass more light than the double form at these long ranges. A ' double-combination ' lens of average focus—say 6 to 8 inches—and of most excellent quality, such as will give perfect definition without any stop, is now obtainable for so moderate a sum as II, 10s., including the rack-work mount.