Richardson's handbook of projection (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1006 HANDBOOK OF PROJECTION FOR the problem is to remove the dirt without causing even very small, faint scratch marks. Any scratches at all in such a sound track, no matter how minute, will cause "surface" or "ground" noise at the horns or loud speakers. Because of the difficulty of removing dirt, particularly oil, without applying sufficient pressure to cause some scratching, I hesitate to advise as to just what method may be best, preferring to suggest that you, knowing the evil effects of scratch marks, use your own good judgment. I would, however, suggest that when cleaning is attempted, only some very soft material should be used for the pad through which you draw the film, and that the material should be changed frequently, because it will of course collect the dirt in its surface. I am of the opinion that, because of the difficulties of cleaning without injury to the sound track, the projectionist is justified in refusing to do it at all. Cleaning is a duty of the exchange. Their contract with the theatre automatically presumes film in first class condition to project — "first class" according to the class of service the theatre is paying for. Regardless of the class of service, however, it may be fairly assumed that it is a part of the duty of the exchange to maintain the films in as perfect a state as the class they represent will permit, and while the fact that a theatre takes cheap service may justify mechanical imperfections which cannot be avoided, such as bits removed in making splices, it does not justify the supplying of dirty films, because that imperfection is unnecessary in that it may be removed by the exchange.