Screenland (Oct 1923-Mar 1924)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

37 THE SCREEN AFRAID OF SEX? By Gladys Hall W hy is the screen afraid of ironic We put the question naively. Laughter. Mocking, magnificent and laughter. Petrova speaks with the poniard of irony. When she writes she dips her pen into vitriol and veracity. When she laughs the heathen gods awake and shudder and the powers of darkness slink away, their tails between their legs. Traditions Do Xot Shackle Petrova S he is brilliant, ruthless and relentless. Bogies jump at her from sentimentally shadowy corners, buper stitions do not shackle her nor traditions hamper her. We said again, more timorously, '"Why is the screen afraid of sex ?" "IS it?" she asked. More laughter. And before our mind's eye came scenes from here and there which must have sent the youths and maidens of the great towns and small hell-bent for the park benches. "Still," we protested feebly, "there's less of it now than there used to be in the flaming films gone by." Which same Madame admitted. do Si not The High Point of Sex i( A a*. H, that is probably true" she said, "some time ago I saw a very well-known picture made by a famous director, who shall be nameless in the interests of discretion. In that picture a scene occurred the fl^The photoplay shuns the facts of sex and whets the appetites of curiosity mongers with fiction of sex. says Mme. Petrova. "There are two ways of looking at sex," mukay says Mme. Petrova. ''One person will say Sex and will mean innuendo and sensuality. Another person will say Sex and will mean frankly what he says." equal of which for sheer ribaldry I have neither seen or heard of since. At that time I said to my companion in the theatre. 'This is the high point of sex on the screen. They can go no farther.' It has evidently proved to be so "Possibly a reaction has set in. I do not see very many pictures and therefore cannot constitute myself as an infallible judge, but it is quite likely that there has been a reaction and that with this reaction the screen will revert to putting skirts on the piano legs and valances of lace and tulle upon the nude statuettes. Afraid of the Reality of Sex JL he screen" is. however, afraid of the reality of sex. It will tear rents in the skirts covering the piano legs, but will not remove them. Result : an urgent and persistent curiosity regarding these factual and not always lovely objects." (Con't. p. 103)