Sponsor (Oct-Dec 1959)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

HERE'S WHAT'S SHOWN IN TvB'S NEW VIEWING SURVEY 00 5 Men Women Teens Children Mon.-Fri. Saturday Sunday Sat. & Sun. CO ISETWORK Audience by 1/^ hour periods y v/ y y J y y y v/ TIME Cumulative audience v/ V ^/ • s/ y • y \/ NETWORK PROGRAM TYPES yy • V x/ V v/ LOCAL Audience by 14 hour periods \/ V V • / y / y v" TIME Cumulative audience I/' • y / V* y y v/ V^ LOCAL PROGRAM TYPES v^ • • >/ y y V' V New storehouse of tv information ^ TvB's most recent study is probably the most comprehensive ever made of U. S. television audiences ^ Emphasis is on people, rather than homes. Survey goes into local, as well as network, program analysis \^ne of the most comprehensive studies of tv viewing ever published has just been released by the Television Bureau of Advertising. The result of a year of intensive work and planning, tabulating and cross-tabulating, the study is a veritable computer-size storehouse of information about the U.S. tv audience, much of which has never been published before. It's the kind of study that doesn't set out to prove anything but actually ends up by disclosing all kinds of fascinating facts that could well trigger some switches in media strategy. Though the study doesn't sell anything except the value of facts, it was designed with a point of view, namely, that the most important measure of the tv audience is people, rather than homes. At first glance, the variety of data are numbing. The study breaks down the audience into four population segments — men, women, teenagers and children — then goes on to show each segment in the process of watching tv (1) by half hours, (2) by cumulative audience, (3) bv network time, (4) by local time, (5) by type of network show — both daytime and nighttime, (6) by type of local show — in five day-parts, I 7) by weekdays, (8) by weekends, (9) by Saturday and Sunday individually, (10) by all seven days of the week. The study breaks out of the ironclad stricture that tv viewing be shown only as a percent of tv homes. Now that nearly nine out of 10 U.S. homes have tv, TvB took the position that it was logical to use U.S. totals for each population segment as a base. (A summary version of this approach can be found in sponsor's 1959-60 Air Media Basics, pages 98 and 100.) In other words, instead of showing that, for example, men constitute 25% of the audience to a show type or time period. TvB tallied the actual number of men involved and calculated the share of all U.S. men who were viewing the particular program time period concerned. SPONSOR 3 OCTOBER 1959 33