Swing (Jan-Dec 1953)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

JOHN CROSBY COMMENTS 333 bills in broadcasting, he has had a way of dominating the program content. And his dominance has generally meant that the level of the program' ming has gone down, not up. That, at least, has been the American experience. Conceivably, the in' [herent British conservative taste may 'overrule the lust of the advertiser to ■'sell goods. Or maybe it won't. Most ■British advertising is a model of de' fccorum and it's doubtful that the worst ■ excesses of American advertising will ■ be repeated over there. Take, for example, this advertiseilment which appears on the wrapper :|of that indubitably British product, ■Pears' Soap. "With the fullest confi' Mdence, the Proprietors of Pears Trans > parent Soap recommend their manw I facture to the notice of those not I already acquainted with its long-es' j tablished merits." So long as the Brit' r ish advertising fraternity turns out > copy like that, the British have nothi ing to fear about commercials on the air — except a tendency to put them to sleep. The British Broadcasting Corpora' tion will continue to be a government owned and operated TV network without commercials. Commercial television will be permitted on a separate competing network which will also be under strict government supervision. Thus competition will be introduced to British broadcasting for the first time and it will be very interesting to see what effect that will have on British programming levels, whether it will drive them up or down. It was long the theory of Sir William Haley, former director general of the BBC and now editor of "The Times" of London, that competitive broadcasting would be "at the mercy of Gresham's Law," that good pro' grams would inescapably be driven out by the bad. Sir William, I'm afraid, clung to the notion that the worse a program was the more popular it would be, a debatable proposition at best. My own theory is that a little competition will stimulate the BBC rather than extinguish it, might drive some of the stuffiness out of British television and could very well be a good thing all around. It's useless to speculate now, though. The British will soon find out whether Gresham's or Crosby's law operates in competitive broadcasting. Mostly It Takes Stamina THE telethon is likely to be with us a long time. The reason is simply that the telethon, as a device for raising money for a charity, is almost unbeatable.