Doris Day / Collection: Government & Law

Start Over Doris Day Collection Government & Law

1. The Fatty Arbuckle case

Date:: 1962
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: March 21, 2024
Excerpt:: know. Maybe Doris was right. Maybe he could start all over again. Arbuckle felt his

2. The Fatty Arbuckle case

Date:: 1962
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: March 21, 2024
Excerpt:: puttees and megaphone (the uniform for directors of the day), reported for duty to the

3. The Fatty Arbuckle case

Date:: 1962
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: March 21, 2024
Excerpt:: there was no morals clause in Arbuckle's contract, the studio had a two-day meeting with

4. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: picture theatre that you had in 1911? A. The Doris. Q. What was the seating capacity of

5. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: service do you use, and by that I mean what program? A. I use three reels. Q. Every day

6. The Fatty Arbuckle case

Date:: 1962
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: March 21, 2024
Excerpt:: his life, Doris made him return the advance payment and stop writing. When he recovered

7. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: your pictures before the day of exhibition? A. No, sir. Our hour for opening up was two

8. The Fatty Arbuckle case

Date:: 1962
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: March 21, 2024
Excerpt:: the audience opening night. Doris came in from the Coast and tried to help backstage. It

9. The Fatty Arbuckle case

Date:: 1962
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: March 21, 2024
Excerpt:: felt would follow. Doris took him aside and said, "Let the picture come I out first

10. National Archives and Records Service film-vault fire at Suitland, Md. : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, June 19 and 21, 1979

Date:: 1979
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: Mrs. Doris Frankenfield and Mr. Albert Herndon, as a preclude to responding to your

11. Memorandum for His Excellency, the Governor of New York, in opposition to an act entitled "To regulate the exhibition of motion pictures, creating a commission therefor, and making an appropriation therefor."

Date:: 1921
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: adequate for "dealing with obscene plays or shows— People vs. "Doris, 14 App. Div. N. Y. 117. Censorship

12. Memorandum for His Excellency, the Governor of New York, in opposition to an act entitled "To regulate the exhibition of motion pictures, creating a commission therefor, and making an appropriation therefor."

Date:: 1921
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: beyond dispute the law is adequate: Muller's case, 96 N. Y.^-0^ People vs. Doris, 14 App. Div. 117

13. The Fatty Arbuckle case

Date:: 1962
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: March 21, 2024
Excerpt:: . Here Doris tried to get him started again, but this time 151

14. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: , sir. Q. And that is the Doris at Wilkinsburg? A. Yes, sir. Q. And when you opened

15. The educational screen

Date:: c1922-c1956]
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: amusing. Doris May, Creighton Hale, Louise Fazenda, Stuart Holmes, Rosemary Theby, and others

16. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: each Change. Number of Reels Mon Tues Wednes Thurs Fri Satur Sunand day

17. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: day after its release, that is to say, is not exhibited anywhere, will a theatre give as

18. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: ., Vitagraph Company of America." RELEASE DAY. The definition of "release day" will hereafter be

19. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: film per day. Q. And in 1908, what was it? A. In 1908 it was increased to possibly

20. Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (Eightieth Congress)

Date:: 1948
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: day to receive your compensation ? Mr. Mackay. No, my regular day was on Thursday. Mr

21. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: defendants1 " 29 Stipulation extending time to file answer to March rule day Mch. 1

22. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: and the third day? A. Very little. Q. But there is some, isn't there, generally? A

23. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: three weeks, or a month later, but with the advent of the release day, the film had a

24. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: manufacturers and importers, after the fifth day of September, 1910. FIFTEENTH: The party of the

25. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 7

Date:: 1912-1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: substitution therefor of the following: 9. The Licensee shall on the first day of ever} month

26. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: often do you change a four-reel program? A. Every other day. Q. That means twelve pictures

27. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: with 3rd day run for $50.00 per week, commencing August 23rd. As stated to you before I

28. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: day — Mr. Caldwell: Those two exchanges. He has only testified to two. Mr. Grosvenor: He

29. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: permitted to use licensed film. RELEASE DAY. The Patents Company has determined to impose a

30. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: day of release, they made some excuse to me that some of the films did not come in

31. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: day? A. I judge by what they do in Philadelphia; and I presume it is the same as in

32. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: , sir. Q. How many reels do you get a day? A. Six. Q. Then in one day you have six

33. Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (Eightieth Congress)

Date:: 1948
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: to strike, we would have to raise the ante on the very lowpaid people each day that

34. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: convention that very day." Mr. Caldwell: That does not justify the question propounded to this

35. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: New York, on the 28th day of June, 1910. Present — Honorable Charles M. Hough

36. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: part, on or before the fifteenth day of November, 1910, all agreements and rights under

37. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: pay to the party of the first part, on or before the fifteenth day of November, 1910

38. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: , I never could, because I never knew what I was to get until the day of the show

39. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: Receiver appointed the next day? A. I don't know about that. I only know the order was

40. Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (Eightieth Congress)

Date:: 1948
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: Carpenters and Joiners of America, Studio Local No. 946 Schedule A (per day, 6 hours, 1 Yi

41. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 7

Date:: 1912-1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: Picture Patents Company, Edison Company and East limn Kodak Company, all dated the 14th day

42. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: Corporation, and the International. Q. How many reels do yon use a day? A. Four. Q. And do

43. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: day prescribed by the manufacturers? A. It is of advantage to have a release day for

44. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: demands of the exhibitors for newer service? A. Yes, sir. Q. Does the release day rule

45. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5

Date:: 1914
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: show, two days each, except Sunday. Q. But you showed each reel more than one day? A

46. Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (Eightieth Congress)

Date:: 1948
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: to do our best, right up to the last day, to see if it couldn't be settled between

47. Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (Eightieth Congress)

Date:: 1948
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: seniority and ability, and they were getting a dollar a day more than I was, and I said

48. Jurisdictional disputes in the motion-picture Industry : hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first-session, pursuant to H. Res. 111 (Eightieth Congress)

Date:: 1948
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: July 19, 2022
Excerpt:: this 60-day interim iieriod while jurisdictional questions were being studied both groups of

49. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: COMPANY 80 Fifth Avenue New York City August 23, 1909. For violating the release-day

50. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1

Date:: 1913
Item Details:: Details and Download Information
Full Page:: Read this page in Context
Highlighting:: Read in Context with Search Highlighted
Date Added:: September 21, 2023
Excerpt:: exhibit these pictures on machines licensed by this Company. 4 RELEASE DAY RULE. The release

« Previous
Next »
1
2
3
4
5
…
53
54

Search

Search Constraints

Search Results

Refine your Search:

Year

Title

Collection

Format

Language

Date Added