161. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: served by the General Film Company? A. I do not just see what you mean by the character
162. Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 Date: 1996 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: 427 The National Film Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Fay Kanin
163. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: Film Service Association and the Film Manufacturers" and "The Platform of the Association
164. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: . Direct examination continued by Mr. Caldwell: Q. What is the effect on film of the
165. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: same competitive advantages. Q. What territory is served by the branch of the General Film
166. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 7 Date: 1912-1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: facilities for the manufacture of such film; and (J. WHEREAS, the "Edison Company/' not being a
167. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 7 Date: 1912-1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: use only sensitized film manufactured and sold by a manufacturer or manufacturers who
168. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: Opinion on Camera and Film Patent. 157 commercial use, at the rate of eight or ten
169. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: Vendor will supply the Vendee with such film of a shorter length than one hundred (100
170. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: that. It is good enough 1 for me. Q. When did the amount of unlicensed film
