251. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: contract? A. Yes. Q. Have you had any difficulty Avith the General Film Company since the
252. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: 564 Gov't Ex. 133, Agt. Edison & Eastman Kodak Cos. Film'' below or above the
253. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: experience in regard to the rapidity with which film wore out? A. Yes. Q. And you found
254. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: establishment of a branch of the Yale Film Exchange in St. Louis, licensed by the Patents Company
255. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: sold to the Mutual, that was giving us a mighty hard fight And also, the Michigan Film
256. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: Pittsburgh Calcium Light Company to the General Film Company? A. It was pretty bad. Q. In
257. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: any theatres served by the other branches of the General Film Company? A. Approximately
258. Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 Date: 1996 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: universal solution to these essentially local problems. The National Film Preservation Board
259. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: make an arrangement to try to get this film, and they never would promise to give it to
260. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 5 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: 2802 Henry R. Slocum, Direct Examination. was receiving more film than the Western
