71. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: , and a feeding mechanism positively engaging the intermediate section of the film, and
72. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: regard that as conclusive. Q. Is this a true statement on page 11 : "The film contains one
73. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: January, 1909, you had 3,000 reels of film, and you were taking service of the Patents
74. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: James J. Lodge, Cross Examination. 1185 turers to furnish film to all licensed film
75. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: Letter of Motion Picture Patents Co. to exhibitors, re Standard Film Exchange, Sept. 22, 1910
76. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6 Date: 1914 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: GENERAL INDEX. lxvii General Film Company, Continued: vol. page Contract
77. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 2 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: petitioner's exhibits. xi PAGE Exhibit 198. Letter, General Film Company to Edgar
78. Copyright term, film labeling, and film preservation legislation : hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on H.R. 989, H.R. 1248, and H.R. 1734 ... June 1 and July 13, 1995 Date: 1996 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: July 19, 2022 Excerpt: Preface 426 By Fay Kanin Chair, National Film Preservation Board The National Film
79. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: the Greater New York Film Rental Company? A. This memorandum shows that during the period
80. In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1 Date: 1913 Item Details: Details and Download Information Full Page: Read this page in Context Highlighting: Read in Context with Search Highlighted Date Added: September 12, 2024 Excerpt: succeeding hole. Irrespective entirely of any action of the take-up reel, the film must advance
