Actorviews (1923)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

312 Actorviews night school, but she does not talk readily of its ways and means. She has no glib maxims on acting, no frothy formulas. I once heard her say, when we were at a play together where a player had been applauded on his exit, “It’s an actor’s own fault when the audience applauds him!” But I don’t think I ever have heard her say that acting is so or such. “Do characters come to you in flashes, or bit by bit?” I asked. And she just looked at me out of her large violet-blue eyes, a little pleadingly, perhaps, to say this was a dull and heavy price to pay for a cup of tea. But I persisted. “How was it with Becky Sharp?” “ Becky jumped at me out of the pages of the book. But many characters,” she went on slowly (for her), “have to be made . . . when the author hasn’t been vivid ... as Ibsen is vivid ... I was rereading him last Summer . . . ‘Rosmersholm,’ ‘Hedda Gabler* and ‘The Pillars of Society’ ... oh, it was bracing !” “You were rather ‘off’ Mr. Ibsen last time we talked,” I rather pusillanimously reminded. “Possibly. It was no doubt the insolence of immaturity.” “He has become important to you again?” “Much more important than ever. I see things in ‘Rosmersholm’ that makes me feel I must have been blind. And in ‘The Pillars’ ! That little bit of a tiny part of Lona Hessel ! She’s very short, but the most beautiful role in all literature; she seems to me to be the last word in purest womanhood. . . . Yes, Ibsen was much more interesting to me last Summer. But that, you see, was because I was older! . . . Youth!” she derided “Fiddlesticks!” “Tell me,” I said, very seriously, “of your first remembered thrill in the theater.”