The advance of photography : its history and modern applications (1911)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

356 THE ADVANCE OF PHOTOGRAPHY without any danger of the insulation breaking down. The current is made and broken under oil by an automatic timing switch, so that it is possible to time the exposure in hundredths of a second. In the figure, the stand to the left shows an arrangement in which, by means of a trigger, the operator causes a weight to fall, and this quickly makes and breaks the current by the aid of the oil switches. In the negative obtained, the more dense parts, e.g. thebones in the hand, will appear white on a dark background. The amount of exposure required is governed by many circumstances, such as the nature of the subject, the hardness of the tube, the size of the coil, the primary current, and the distance of the tube from the plate. Hard tubes require shorter exposures than soft tubes, but negatives obtained by hard tubes are very apt to be thin. To radiograph the bones of the hand, Messrs Cox recommend an exposure of five to ten seconds, when using a 10-inch coil and the ordinary break, while with the same coil, twenty to thirty seconds exposure is necessary to obtain a successful negative of the ankle bones. The thorax under the same conditions requires still longer, and the pelvis must be exposed for about one minute. When a larger current is sent through the tube, by using an electrolytic break in place of the hammer break, these times are of course in all cases considerably reduced. The nature of the photographs obtained with a tube depends to a very great extent on the hardness of the tube. This is very clearly shown in the three figures (159, 160,, 160a). The first of these is taken with a soft tube, that is onein which the vacuum is not a sufficiently high one, and it can be at once seen that even the less dense parts throw quite a distinct shadow, and consequently there is a lack of good definition. The second shows what definition and distinctness can