Agfa motion picture topics (Apr 1937-June 1940)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

The Practical Relationship Retwreen in a tn ni a and Visual Contrast By S. D. Lund Laboratory Division. Universal Studio T7 very industry has at one time or -^another undergone changes brought about by the application of new principles or inventions. In the case of the motion picture, such a change took place when sound, and especially filmrecorded sound, was introduced. One of the most significant of these changes was in the field of laboratory processing methods. The necessity for faithful sound reproduction — the fact that the photographic quality of the sound-track print must he an exact replica of that of the sound negative if good sound is to be heard -caused a major revolution in the methods of the industry’s film-processing laboratories. The rather loose methods which had previously sufficed, based as they were largely on visual inspection and personal skill and judgement, were not sufficiently accurate for this purpose. and as a result the more accurate methods of sensitometric control were substituted. This brought a host of new and hitherto unfamiliar technical terms and phrases into the picture. Some of them still seem perplexing and unnecessarily complicated to many cinematographers, since they seem in some cases to substitute new and complex values for the terms with which the industry grew up. It is the purpose of this article to attempt a simple translation of some of them into the more familiar terms of everyday photographic practice. Chief among these terms are cryptic references to “the H. & D. Curve” and to “Gamma.” Basically, these are simple enough, if one will simply consider the former as a skctch-map of the latitude and contrast characteristics of a film and the latter as a numerical expression of contrast. Every practical photographer knows from experience that with any type of film there is a definite relation between the exposure given and the density produced. Within certain limits, an increase in exposure brings a corresponding increase in density. But in the very low exposure ranges, and in the very high exposure ranges, this does not hold good. In the low region, that is, in the extreme lowest shadows, the exposure has to increase a lot to make a relatively small increase in density. In the very high region — the extreme "hottest” highlights — most 23