American cinematographer (Jan-Dec 1926)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Ten AMERICAN CINEMATOGRAPHER June, 192C Effect of Desensitixers in Deuelopment Part Two of Investigations on Photographic Developers Is Released Bij m. L. Dundon and J. I. Crabtree Of the Eastman Research Laboratory. Paper Was Read at Spring Meeting of Society of Motion Picture Engineers SERIES A SERIES 3 MO EFFECT SERIES 2. SERIES 1 SERIES 0 SERIES 00 Figure Tivo — Relative photographic effect of Wratten safelights on Panchromatic film. I. Introduction. The inspection of film during development is often desirable even though the time and temperature method can be used to produce negatives of a definite development contrast or gamma. Especially in the case of motion picture film, where only one positive material is used for printing all scenes, the production of negatives of fixed density contrast is desirable. In order to obtain this result the time of development must be varied according to the contrast of the original subject. Also, in ordinary photography, freedom of inspection during development may be of great assistance in obtaining the particular results desired. II. Methods of Securing Visibility During Development. The greatest possible visibility during development may be obtained by using an efficient safelight and by desensitizing the film. 1. Suitable Choice of Safelight. In selecting an efficient safelight there are two factors to consider, (a) the sensitivity of the eye to light of different colors and wavelength, and (b) the color sensi tiveness of the emulsion used. Mees and Baker1 have explained this matter clearly and defined safelight efficiency as the product of the vsiual intensity of the light transmitted multiplied by its safety for a given emulsion. The relation of these factors is represented graphically in Fig. I where curves showing the special sensitivity of the eye and the special sensitivity of typical photographic emulsions are plotted on the same scale of wavelengths as the transmission of the Wratten safelights. From the upper curve2 showing the spectral sensitivity of the eye it is evident that of a given intensity of radiation, the human eye is much more sensitive to green or yellow than to red or blue light. In fact the average point of maximum visibility for a large number of observers was at 560 mm. Ordinary photographic emulsions, on the other hand, are sensitive only to the blue and violet, but when made orthochromatic they are sensitive also to green, and when panchromatic the sensitivity includes the red and is ex 1. C. E. K. Mees and J. K. Baker, "A Measurement of the Efficiency of Dark Room Filters," Phot. Jour. 47, 267, (1907). 2. K. S. Gibson and E. P. T. Tyndall, •■Visibility of Radiant Energy," Sci. Paper, Bur. Standards, No. 475.