The art of sound pictures (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

196 THE ART OF SOUND PICTURES register a little. And this little which serves you as data is construed almost wholly in terms of your own unique nature. Now reverse the situation. Suppose that you are a zoologist making a biological survey of an unknown territory. You have telescopes, a large staff of helpers, and plenty of time to investigate the little dots you see on the distant field. Furthermore, you are moved by a strong desire to make your report of the local fauna as complete and as accurate as possible. Instead, then, of guessing what the dots are, you command your party to march over to them, making observations as you go. Finally, you get close enough so that you see them, hear them, smell them, and perhaps touch them. Every member of your party does likewise. You exchange information and impressions with one another. And now what happens? Your conclusion as to what these things are is determined almost entirely by the totality of sense impressions of all the members of your party, taken in combination. So long as you were all ten miles away from the moving dots, one of you might have insisted in all sincerity that they were antelopes, while another declared that they were brown bears. But, as you increased the number and variety of your immediate impressions, such personal differences of opinion are inevitably overwhelmed. Now the objective fact stands forth. What has this to do with the motion pictures? Well, for one thing, it means that when you look at a mere play of light upon a screen in a darkened hall, you are far closer to dream life than when you are hearing the characters on a movie screen talk their parts. Every word they utter determines the nature of the situation,