Boxoffice (Jul-Sep 1963)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

BUY When you get from $1.70 to $2.46 worth of absolute value for each dollar you spend in trade paper advertising to U.S.A. and Canadian exhibitors , your best het is obvious — and beyond any sound argument. THE \ou actually get from 70% to 146% greater coverage of North American exhibitors — theatre owners, managers, circuit executives — the people who do the buying — through BOXOFFICE, than through the next two largest film trade papers. BIG Please note that we are not referring in this to our huge lead in grand total net paid circulation. This is “class A” circulation (theatre owners, managers, circuit executives, film buyers and bookers) — the people who make or influence the BUYING decisions for the motion picture theatres of the United States and Canada. ECONOMY Nobody who isn't important at theatres is included in these figures; neither is anybody in Timbuktu or any other foreign land. SIZE Only by buying a combination of several other film trade papers can you get anything like the exhibitor readership coverage of BOXOFFICE alone — and at a cost of at least double the rate per thousand! Remember, too, that many of BOXOFFICE’s exhibitorsubscribers nowadays read no other film trade paper! A Few Quick Facts: • Latest net paid circulation in U.S.A. and Canada for the three leading trade papers is: BOXOFFICE, 17,047; M. P. Exhibitor, 9,522; M. P. Herald, 7,257. Thus, BOXOFFICE has more than the other two papers COMBINED! • BOXOFFICE carries a greater grand total of national advertising than does any other film trade paper. • Exclusive advertising and total volume placed through advertising agencies is far greater in BOXOFFICE than in any other film trade paper. • The advertising cost per thousand paid subscribers is far lower than in any other film trade paper. • BOXOFFICE provides saturation coverage— practically everybody who is "anybody" in this industry reads it regularly. In ALL Ways FIRST with the MOST of the BEST