Start Over

Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
00025
Language:
English
Collection:
Books and Government & Law
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

I'Aur III. i;{ wliicli it was (MUiccdcd would liaNc hccii within the |)r()liihiti(ms of tlic Slicriiia ii Act if applicable to coinnicrcc in imco])yri,L;lit (mI hooks. 'I'hc Slrtms case is on all fours wit li the ease at har. And linally, in I'Jastcrn IjK nthcr Dealers Assn. v. I ' nil < <l States (2;U V. S., (iOO), it was held that the systematic circulation anions the members of tlie associations of official reports calling the attention of the members to actions of specified wholesalers in selling direct to consumers tended to prevent members of the associations from dealing with the wholesalers named in the reports and to directly and unreasonably restrain trade by preventing trade with such wholesalers. 'In Part XIII of this brief, infra, wt review at considerable length each of the tw^elve cases decided by the Supreme Court since it enunciated the rule of reason in the Standard Oil and Tobacco Trust cases. Paet III. PATENTS AND PATENT EIGHTS CAN NOT BE MADE A COVER FOR VIOLATION OF THE SHERMAN ACT. The controversy in this case is disposed of by the decision of the Supreme Court in the so-called ''Bathtub Trust'' case (Standing Sanitary Mfg. Co, V. United States, 226 U. S., 20), decided November 18, 1912. That was a price-fixing trade agreement in the form of licenses under patents under which 16