Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
00071
Language:
English
Collection:
Books and Government & Law
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

I'AKI IV. Tlic clTcct n\' tlirsc I'd 1 1 ;i I -( 'Xcl i;i I I'^r .'ii^ r<M'mcnts was to |)l.-i(M' all 1 lie rental ('XcliaiiLirs at t lie iinTcy of (Icrcihlants and the Patctits ( 'o. This (•( mi j >aiiy would not all(>w exhibitors to lease t'i(»iii dirt'ereiit cxcliaiiucs, hut reciuircd each cxhihitor to obtain liis entire^ su)>ply (d* tihns t'l-oin one exchange. In tliis ivspect competition between rental exehan^es was eliminated. Each rental exchange paid the same for its tilnis as every other exchange. To-day eaeli of the 10 Patents Co. licensees leases its films at the same prices and on the same terms as the other 9 licensees. 9. EA-liihitors controlled through so-called licenses. * (Pet., p. 24.) Early in January 1909, the defendants commenced to do business in accordance with the tenns of the licensing arrangement which they had formed, and thereafter not one of the thousands of theater owners or exhibitors in the United States could obtain for exhibition pui'poses a motion-picture manufactured by any of the 10 manufacturers, comprising practically all the manufacturers and importers at that time doing business in the United States, unless the Patents Co. recognized him and gave his name as a licensed exhibitor to the licensed exchanges. In order to secure a license the exhibitor had to obligate himself to use upon his machines only pictures manufactured by the licensed manufacturers. The exhibitor had to pay on every