Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
00072
Language:
English
Collection:
Books and Government & Law
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

60 PART IV. exhibiting machine o\Mied by him $2 a week to the Patents Co. ; this so-called exJiihitor's royalty applied to machines sold to the exhibitor long before the foryyiation of the Patents Co, ivithout any conditions being attached to the sale. No two exchanges were permitted to serve the same exhibitor. Breach by a rental exchange or by an exhibitor of any of the conditions imposed by the defendants through the Patents Co. subjected such rental exchange or exhibitor to an immediate cancellation of his license. The power and monopoly of the defendants became absolute. Defendants, through the Patents Co., were enabled to and did determine whether nc^w motion-picture theaters should or should not be opened and whether old ones should be closed, although defendants had no proprietary interest in such theaters. 30. License agreements with mamifactiirers of projecting machines, (Pet, p. 25.) Defendants, on December 18, 1908, by means of the Patents Co. and the so-called license agreements bound together all manufacturers of movingy)icture cameras and films into one comil)nation. With the same unlawful ])urpose, and as a fui-ther meaTis to monopolize trade in positive films, they devised license agreements ])etween the l^itents Co. and each manufactui-er of projecting machines.