Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
00087
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

I'Aur V. 75 ci'al b'iliM Cn. arc not all<»\\'c(l to display the lihns (){' the in(lei>en(lenl nia nu I'act n I'ci's. I ndcpciMlenl exchan<j,*es ai'e cut olT fi'oin haiidlinn" the lihii <»!' t h(; 10 I *atents ( 'o. licenses, and iiKh'pcndcnt exhil)itoi's and t heater owners can not obtain t'< uexhibit ion in their theaters the pictures (d* tiie Patents ij). licensees. 14. 71/r /ira/fcr. The relief asked is similar to that prayed for and granted in the so-ealled '^Bathtub Trust,'' " Tobacco Trust," and Harvester " cases, and is framed with a view to effectively destroy the existing" combination, to remove the undue obstructions to conmierce, and to restore nonual conditions in the trade. (Pet., pp. 39-42.) Paet V. CONCERNING THE DEFENSE— THE ANSWERS. There is no controversy as to the essential facts. The defendants admit the execution of the various agreements described in the petition, the accuracy of the summaries of those agreements contained in the petition and largely set out in this brief, and the enforcement of the provisions of the license agreements. They stoutly deny all manner of intent to obstruct the free flow^ of commerce. We take issue with them on the question (^f intent. However, as we point out elsewhere in tliis brief, (Pai-t XIV), the Supreme Court of the United