Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000121
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
November 08, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

I'AKT VII. 109 [Tlic witness testified llial the IJio^raph ( 'o. paid $2,500 for the Latliaiii patent. ( 1, H(i. ) | Q. The Lalliam i)atent had been issued fi\'e or six years hefoi-e t hat, had it not? A. I l)elieve it had been. Q. And then yon hroni^ht u lot of suits right away, in 19()S, aj^ainst the dill'erent Edison lieensees upon that Latham patent? A. We brought a number of suits on the Latham patent very soon after we acquired it. Q. In the answer that }'ou tiled you make the statement that everybody had been infringing the Latham patent for five or six years. Is that the fact ? A. Ever since it had been issued. Q. You liad been infringing it, too ? A. It was always a question wdiether we infringed it Avith our Biograph camera or not. We infringed it with the Warwick camera, wdiile w^e used the Warwick camera. But we did not make use of projecting machines. * * * * ^ Q. At this time, in March, 1908, the other manufacturers said that this Latham patent w^as not of any consequence, didn't they ? A. Well, I presume they did. I don't know\ Q. As a matter of fact, none of these patents wTre considered of dominant im])ortance by all you parties imtil you formed this new company, and conveyed them to it, w^ere they?