Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000125
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
November 08, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

TAiri" (litioiis prior to the loriiiatioii of the I'atcnls ( \nii|).-my ! A. 1 think' it is very iiikm mmn »ii for pc*)vnij^'AiX^'d in husiiicss to |)ay much attention to the patents uiih'ss the owners ot* the patents make efTofts to enforee the patents. Q. As I un(h'rstoo(l your kast answei*, you niaintaiii that your i)osition t(>-(hiy on these patents is just what it was })rior to tlie formation of the Patents Company i A. Oh, I did not mean to say that at all, Mr. Grosvenor. I mean to say that our position when we are fighting a patent that belongs to some1)ody else is radically different from our position when we own the patent f and we are trying to enforce it. Referring to a statement entitled " The Facts," issued by the Biograph Co., Mr. Marvin was asked (I, 227, fol. 4) : Q. And you think your position to-day is perfectly in accord with your x^osition when you sent this circular around ^ A. No; I would not say that. It is very different. Then we were fighting the patent, and now we ovm it. Then we were ])elittling it ; now we are making the most of it. [It is suggested that the couit read the circular referred to, Govt. Ex. 55, I, 132-133.] Before the trust was formed ^Ir. Dyer derided the Latham patent; in March, 1908, he made the following statement published in the Show AVorld. 64717—14 9