Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000132
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
November 08, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

120 PAET VIII. Nearly every manufacturer called by defendants testified that he infringed the patents openly and that the others were infringing them : Marvin (I, 28, fols. 1-2 ; 69, fol. 1. I, 124, fol. 1 ; 127, fol. 4; 128, fols. 1-2; 148, fol. 3. I, 225, fols. 3-4; 226, fols. 1-2.) Dyer (Dyer Int., Govt. Ex., 173. II, 920-922. Ill, 1480, fol. 3; 1647-1649. Ill, 1669, fol. 3; 1670, fols. 2-3.) Smith (III, 1713, fols. 1-2.) Long (IV, 1918, fol. 4.) Blackton (IV, 1881, fol., 2. IV, 2082, fol. 3; 2086, fol. 4.) Armat (IV, 2173, fols. 1-2. IV, 2179, fols. 1-3; 2185, fols. 2-3.) The answer of Patents Co. also so states. (Pp. 29-33, 34, 35, 38, 41, 45, 76, 78, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 128.) Likewise the other answers. What credence can be given to the testimony of Messrs. Marvin and Dyer as to the worth of these patents in view of their former statements directly the contrary of what they now assert ? Part VIII. CONCERNING THE MANNER IN WHICH THE COMBINATION WAS FORMED. 1. Conditions in 1908 — The Edison Licenses — Film Service Association. That the unlawful association of manufacturers called the Edison Licensees and the association of exchanges called the Film Service Association were