Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000201
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

PAUL IX. 189 li.'ixiiii;" an illegal (-( mihi nat ion then. L tli<nii;-lit I would want to l(*a\c you for the alibi, and I liaNC been able to do that for qnitc a w hilc, but I can not do tiiat any more. 'I'hcy sini[)Iy made up tiicir minds they were g()iii<>: to iz:('t you out of the way, and I suppose they will do it." Fox wanted to stay in business, not to s(dl. He testified (IT, 683, fol. 1) : I had ])een pleading, Please reinstate my license." That I did not want to sell for any money at all, no matter what they offered me. If they would have assured me that they were not going to cancel my license, I would not have sold my place of business for $500,000 nor $600,000, ^^becaiise my plant w\^s earning from $60,000 to $75,000 a year. T did not want to sell a business of that kind. * * ^ It was after they had made it very clear to me that it was time to sell, and told me Avhat happened to a few others, that I agreed to put a figure on it at all. At a final interview with Kennedy just before the cancellation became effective. Fox agreed to accept $90,000 for his exchange. (II, 685, fol. 2.) Kennedy at once telephoned Marvin, telling him that he (Kennedy) was arranging to buy Fox's plant and that he wanted the license reinstated so that the General Film Co. could purchase the business of the Greater Xew York Film Rental Co. (II, 686, fol. 3.) Kennedy directed Marvin to ring up a number of the manufaeturei*s until he got a