Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

TART IX. 191 possible to ovt it jo liiiu. ( II, <;!)!, t'ol. 1.) The n()ti('(' (^f cancellation, dated I 7, signed IT. N. Mar\ in, \ iee president, assi^ne(l no reason, but merely notilied b'ox's e<nn|);iny tliat bis license would terminate at S o'clock on Monday, t be 25tb of Decembei'. ( 1 1, ()92, fob 4.) A few (biys after tbe i'ecei])t (d' tbe not ice tbe Bioc:ra|)b Co. did not deliver Hlni, and ever since tliat day tbe Greater New York Film Rental Co. lias been eno:ai},(Hl in continnons litigation in tbe conrts in a d(^t(*nnined effort to i)reserve its existence. On February 13, 1913, Fox received a tbird notice of cancellation from tbe Patents (\), (II, 696, fob 2), the enforcement of wbieli was prevented only by the interposition of tbe Attorney General of the United States. Tbe largest theaters in New York are licensed theaters. The witness testified on February 27, 1913, that 95 per cent of tbe large theaters in Greater New York are licensed l)y tb(^ Motion Picture Patents Co. " I say 95 per cent in view of the fact that I do not know^ of more than one place wdiere unlicensed pictures are shown at the present time in a large theater the same thing is true in Newark, N. J. ; Springfield, Mass. ; New Haven and Bridgepoi-t, Conn. (II, 699, fob 2.) Fox owms a large number of theaters, all of which are licensed. At tbe time be testified, under the terms of his license agreement, he w^as unable to display in these theaters unlicensed pictures, al