Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000206
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

194 PART IX. ers we could serve were a few that could run through what films we had left. (II, 1235, fols. 1, 2.) In the film-exchange business it is necessary to have a constant, steady, and uninterrupted supply of film in order to retain customers. After receipt of the notice, each of the manufacturers stopped distributing film to witness' two companies. (II, 1235, fols. 3, 4.) The witness went from St. Louis to New York early in August in an effort to have the cancellation of his licenses revoked. (II, 1236, fol. 3.) There he called upon Mr. Kennedy. The mtness testified that Kennedy stated that in his opinion it was a grievous mistake that the exchanges had been canceled, and he admitted that innocent people had been affected through want of knowledge of the conditions. (II, 1237, fol. 2.) However, the cancellations were not revoked, and the companies were absolutely ignored from that time up to the date of the giving of his testimony by the witness, Graham, on July 11, 1913. (II, 1237, fol. 4; 1238, fol. 1.) JOSEPH HOPP, half owner and manager of the S>tandard Film Exchange, of Chicago, licensed by th(^ Patents Co. (II, 1058 et seq.) The fact that practically all manufacturers and importers of motion-picture films had joined the Pat(^nts Co., controlling the only films that were available at that time, induced Hopp to take out a