Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

206 PABXilX. In the latter part of July, 1914, this verdict of $20y42A was affirmed by the Court of Common Pleas of the State of Pennsylvania. WILLIAM H. SWANSON: This witness was the owner of William H. Swanson & Co., with branches in Chicago, New Orleans, Omaha, Kansas City, and St. Louis. In the beginning of 1909 he had between 600 and 700 customers, being perhaps the largest exchange in the United States. (I, 296, fols. 1-2.) At the meeting in New York, January, 1911, Swanson opposed the 14-day clause and the imposition of the $2-a-week royalty on exhibitors, and headed a committee of exchange men who sought, but unsuccessfully, to persuade the manufacturers to eliminate these features from the agreements. (I, 300-304.) About the middle of February, 1909, he attended a meeting of Chicago exchange men, at which defendants Selig, Kleine, Spoor, and Rock, and representatives of the Edison, Pathe, and Kalem companies were present. (I, 308, fol. 4.) The purpose of the meeting was the discussion of the royalty on projecting machines which dealers w^anted removed. (I, 309, fol. 1.) Swanson, as chairman, made a speech presenting the purposes of the meeting. Kleine opposed him. (I, 309, fol. 4.) The controversy became bitter. The next day Spoor, Selig, and Kleine went to New York, and the following day Swanson received a telegram, signed J. J. KeiuKHly, treasurer, stating that his license