Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000231
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

PAHl IX. 219 t'ol. i^) Swansoii tcstifiod that S('li<^^ Klciiic, and S{)ooi' told him at the I^cpiihlicaii (1ul) in Xcw York, at the time of the January meeting, that they had hukU' ai'i'ant^ernents witli the I^astnian Kodak Co. to ^et tlie exehisive use ot* the Kastnian stock, and that a competitor would have but very little chance entering the field. (I, 307, fol. 2.) 4. Circnhfrs to rental e.rc/uDifjes and < jcliiljitors. The Patents Co. has issued many circulars to rental exchanges and exhibitors, which illustrate the manner in which the combination works and how all the oppressive restrictions are invariably enforced. These circulars sent broadcast to all exchanges and exhibitors contain the names of many excllanges and exhibitors who have been cut off from supplies of film, the purpose of the notice being to warn others not to deal with those thus cut off. In this respect the circulars are like those declared unlawful in the most recent decision of the Supreme Court under the Sherman Act, Eastern Betail Lumber Dealers' Assoc. v. United States, 234 U. S., 600. (a) Extracts from circulars of the Patents Co. to excllanges. (Jan. 9, 1909, I, 29-34.) The following was the notice the Patents Co. sent out when it commenced doing business and required exchanges to sign the so-called exchange license. To the Film Rental Exchanges: The Motion Picture Patents Co. has been incorporated for the purpose of taking over, and has ac