Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
Brief for the United States
Date:
1914
Publisher:
Washington, D.C. : United States. Government Printing Office. Office of the Public Printer
Volume:
Brief for the United States
Leaf #:
000252
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
Media History Digital Library
Sponsor:
{"Media History Digital Library","Richard Koszarski",Domitor}
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
Date Added:
June 06, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

240 PART XI. Hunter, A^^ilkinsburg, Pa., V, 2624, fol. 4. Kessler, Sandusky, Ohio, V, 2679, fol. 1. Marsey, Buffalo, N. Y., IV, 2003, fol. 1. Newsome, Birmingham, Ala., Y, 3018, fol. 4. Scheck, Baltimore, Md., lY, 2398, fol. 4. Scherer, Johnstown, Pa., Y, 2612, fol. 4; 2613, fol. 1. Super, Burlington, N. J., lY, 2110, fol. 2. Thomas, Springfield, Mo., Y, 2749, fol. 4. Braley, Toledo, Ohio, Y, 2642, fol. 1. Brandt, New York City, lY, 1892, fol. 3. Kertscher, Brooklyn, N. Y., lY, 1943, fol. 2. Part XI. THE AGREEMENTS ARE BEING ENFORCED TO-DAY. The license agreements and the restrictions contained in them are being enforced to-day. Defendant Marvin testified, on January 15, 1913, that the rule which prohibits the so-called licensed theaters from using motion pictures that are not licensed is being enforced. (Marvin, 1, 129, fol. 1.) The answers of defendants repeatedly assert the validity of all the terms and conditions contained in the license agreements. ( Ans. Pat. Co., 101, fol. 356, pp. 150 et seq., pp. 102, 104.) The modifications made in the license agreement of December 18, 1908 (Ex. 3, Pet.), by means of the subsequent supplemental agreements of January 26, 1909, and June 6, 1912, are set out in the answer