Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

I'AIM \m. 251 Pnit XIII. CONCERNING THE MANNER IN WHICH THE SUPREME COURT HAS APPLIED THE " RULE OF REASON ' IN THE TWELVE CASES DECIDED SINCE THE STANDARD OIL AND TOBACCO DECISIONS. 1. U. S. V. Tcnuinal Iidilroad Ass,>c/(i/ ion (224 U.S., 383). (/////7/, ]). L>r)l.) 2. Standard Sanilaru Mann fact nrimj Co. v. L\S. (226 U. S., 20). {Infra, p. 254.) 3. U. S. V. Union Pacific R. R. Co. (226 U. S., 61). {Infra, p. 257.) 4. U, S. V. Bcadinfj Co. (226 U. S., .324). {Infra, p. 265.) 5. U. S. V. Pat fen (226 U. S., 525). (Infra, p. 271.) 6. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co, (227 U. S., 8). {Infra, p. 274.) 7. V, S. V. WinsJoH' (227 U. S., 202). {Infra, p. 277.) 8. U. S. V. Pacific d'* Arctic Raihcay d' Navigation Co. (228 U. S., 87). {Infra, p. 280.) 9. Xash V. r. S. (229 U. S., 373). (Infra, p. 282.) 10. Bauer v. O'Donnell (229 U. S., 1). {Infra, p. 284.) 11. Straus Y. American PuhlisJiers' Association (231 U. S., 222). {Infra, p. 288.) 12. Eastern States Lumber Association v. U. S. (234 U. S., 600). {Infra, p. 292.)