Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

I'AKI Mil. 267 It was .-ir^iicd hy (l('tVii(|;in1 's ('(.iiiiscl in thf Supreme ('(Uirl tli.il since tlie new line of railroad had l)een effeel i\-e!y strangled it wnnid he idle to enjoin tlie doinu* (d* an act already aee( »ni|)l ished. ]•. Justice I Jirton said : ()^r)2) that is a narmw \icw (d* the r(dief which may he granted under the statute and tlie frame of this hill. The conihination hy means of the Temple Co. still exists. It has ])een and still is an etifieient au'eney for the eolleetive aetiviti(\s of the (hdVndant eai'riers for the ])urpose of preventing competition in the trans] )ortatif>]i and sale of eoal in other States. That under the law of Pennsylvania (^aeh of the defendant carrier companies has the power to acquire and hold the stock of coalproducing companies may be true. That the Temple Company may, mider the same law, have the power to acquire and hold the capital stock of the Simpson &: Watkins collieries may also be conceded. But if the defendant carriers did, as we have found to be the fact, combine to restrain the freedom of interstate conunerce either in the transportation or in the sale of anthracite coal in the markets of other States, and adopted as a means for that purpose the Temple Company, and, throTigh it, the control of the great Simpson & AVatkins collieries, the parts of the general scheme, however lawful considered alone, become parts of an illegal combination under the Federal statute which it is the duty of the court to dissolve, irrespective of how the legal title to the shares is held. (Han iman v»