Brief for the United States (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

292 PART XIII. The defendants were various lumber associations, composed largely of retail lumber dealers located in many States. It was held that the systematic circulation among the members of the associations of official reports calling the attention of the members— retail dealers — to actions of specified wholesalers in selling direct to consumers tended to prevent members of the associations from dealing with the wholesalers named in the reports and to directly and unreasonably restrain trade by preventing trade with such wholesalers. Mr. Justice Day said : (608) True it is that there is no agreement among the retailers to refrain from dealing with listed wholesalers, nor is there any penalty annexed for the failure so to do, but he is blind indeed who does not see the purpose in the predetermined and periodical circulation of this report to put the ban upon wholesale dealers whose names appear in the list of unfair dealers trying by methods obnoxious to the retail dealers to supply the trade which they regard as their own. Referring to the Sherman Act, he said : (609) It broadly condemns all combinations and conspiracies which restrain the free and natural flow of trade in the channels of interstate commerce. And after citing all the recent cases: (611) These principles are applicable to this situation. Here are wholesale dealers in large nimiber engaged in interstate trade upon whom it is proposed to impose as a condition of carrying on that trade that they